Philadelphia E-Lane Initiative

3 Apr

April 1s from Philly from CBC News:

Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter said the designated lane for distracted walkers takes aim at the dangers of distracted walking, according to the Associated Press.

City officials painted lines on a stretch of street near city hall, designating it an “E-lane,” with a stick figure bent down peering at a digital device, which will exist until the end of the week.

“Stand on any sidewalk in Philadelphia you will see fellow citizens with busy lives who can’t take the time to look up from their IPhones, [BlackBerrys] and other electronic devices,” said Nutter in a news release announcing a one-week pilot project.

“The E-Lane is a safe and convenient option for those distracted walkers and should make sidewalks safer for the rest of us.”

 

Tags: ,

The Ikea manual for building a neighbourhood

2 Apr

Why would one of the world’s largest furniture companies want to design and build a city neighbourhood? Is this taking vertical integration to a whole new level? There is possibly a good economic argument to be made for Ikea designing your life: whether it’s the couch in your living room or the building you live in, or office you work at. But as the G&M article indicates, there is no plan for Poäng chairs and Swedish meatballs here.

Or is this an answer to housing affordability? As Ikea business development manager says, “its aim of slashing production costs could eventually remove the need for “affordable” homes.” Although, given Ikea’s business model, the impacts of a post-carbon future might influence the degree of cost “slashing”.

Maybe this neighbourhood manual is destined to become one of the socio-spatial plans that gave creedence to the urban planning profession. Take Howard’s Garden City for example, or Perry’s Neighbourhood Unit, as the kind of manipulation of built environments to achieve social harmony.

In any case, a large company with lots of cash hanging around wants to put it somewhere long-term. Here is the Ikea Manual for building a neighbourhood. Read it twice, and don’t forget your allen key.

Source: The Globe and Mail

Source: The Globe and Mail

Source: London Evening Standard

Event: Oil Vulnerability and Cities

23 Mar

April 12, 2012 | SFU Vancouver | 7:00PM | Reserve

Dr. Jago Dodson and Dr. Neil Sipe from Griffith University will discuss concepts and methods for investigating oil vulnerability in metropolitan areas with examples from Australia, the US and Canada.

This will be followed by a wider discussion of regional planning and technological responses to oil vulnerability including the role of electric vehicles.

Free Public Talk

Tags: , , ,

Event: Dense neighbourhoods without towers?

15 Mar

2881 Main St at 13th (St. Patrick’s Church)

The Residents Association of Mount Pleasant is hosting a community forum that will address the question: can we build high density neighbourhoods without towers?

Urban Design Specialist Lewis N. Villegas says “We can build high density neighbourhoods in Vancouver without building towers.” Lewis will present the new planning paradigm in a multi-media presentation entitled “The Density Fallacy”.

Professor Patrick Condon of UBC SALA will speak to the issue of exploring options to towers that are more resilient, affordable, and compatible with existing neighbourhood character. Speakers from RAMP will examine the Rize Rezoning design before City Council at the ongoing Public Hearing; alternate design scenarios will be explored within the current C3A zoning.

Jim Lehto will summarize the C3A zoning. Mr. Lehto formerly served the City of Vancouver as Downtown Development and Downtown Policy Planner; he holds a Bachelor of Architecture and Bachelor of Arts from the University of Toronto and a Masters of Architecture and Urban Design from Harvard.
The C3A zoning has been used in several recent projects in Mount Pleasant. Come join the discussion.

More info from the RAMP website.

Tags: , ,

Andrew’s Portland Photos

14 Mar

Tags: ,

Dear Tomorrow…

12 Mar

From the office of Mark Lakeman | City Repair + Communitecture

Dear Tomorrow

 

Tags: , ,

Dignity Village

12 Mar

The past week, approximately a dozen SFU Urban Studies students took the train down to Portland, Oregon. Included in our itinerary was an in-person visit to Dignity Village, an encampment recognized by the City of Portland. The site is located in North Portland and is bound by a compost facility, the airport and a jail. The site can accommodate up to 60 residents.

Image

Google View of Dignity Village

About Dignity Village

Dignity Village operates under a governance structure similar to ones used in co-ops (bylaws, Board members and various committees). The Village has strict rules regarding alcohol, drugs, children and violence. Residents build their own homes from scrap material.  The wait list can run from 6-20 residents depending on the season. People who submit their names to the wait list must check in every week to confirm their spot. The site is monitored 24 hours by security. Many if not all residents qualify for and use food stamps. The site has sustainable features such as a rainwater catchment bin and numerous gardens.

Image

Because the site is located on city land, residents have to meet with staff and Council every few years to renew their contract. The site is serviced by one bus (route 73) which runs every half hour between the hours of 6:30 a.m.-10:30 p.m. on weekdays. There is electricity and it is paid for by residents. Electricity powers a television, miscellaneous items such as a coffee maker and items specific to residents with health concerns. Although a volunteer therapist makes regular visits, the CEO felt that an addictions counselor and job training were equally important.

Image

Raised garden. This plot had tomatoes.

Thoughts About Dignity Village

I had a really difficult time trying to pick a side. And perhaps this was an error on my part because I have concluded that the answer is not black and white. Dignity Village brings up some really interesting thoughts and part of this is because I have no point of reference. What I will do is consider the strengths and weaknesses of Dignity Village. On the one hand, residents are empowered. The self-governing organization of the village builds their self-esteem and confidence. They are learning to be self-sufficient in a safe environment and they are surrounded by a supportive community who understand homelessness.

However, the site’s distance from the city centre makes the commute to services and facilities difficult as it requires payment (bus fare) and time (half hour from start to end of the line). The distance may present a barrier to residents trying to find and/or retain a job, the proximity of the site to the compost facility is a concern for those with health complications and even though the residents are living on city land the reality of living on city lands means residents have to conform to the city’s requests. So yes they are empowered but they are also privy to the City’s requests.

ImageElectricity Source

A colleague made an interesting observation: To some, dignity is more important than the modern conveniences I have grown accustomed to. His observation made me reflect on my personal values and opinions, and to what extent are they influencing my stance on Dignity Village. Are my values narrowing my focus and preventing me from seeing the bigger picture? Although I agree with my colleague, I also think we can do better. The site is located so far away that you can’t help but understand the message being sent by Mayor and Council. The nearest walk-in clinic is located 2.8 miles away (a 53 minute walk or 50 minute bus ride that involves three busses) and the nearest food bank is a 16-minute walk away (Google does not identify any viable transit routes).

What are your thoughts about Dignity Village? Have you visited Dignity Village? And if yes, what are your thoughts about it?

Image

Filing out of the commons and checking out the cat

Tags: , , , ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 455 other followers