Archive | February, 2012

Burrard Station: construction update

28 Feb

The following photos show some of the renovations going on at Burrard Station at the moment. A new elevator entrance is being built to accommodate faregates, and before/after photos show what it will look like when completed.

This is one of my favourite stations in Vancouver – the architecture resembles a Victorian-era British railway station (peaked roof like St. Pancras and King’s Cross), and the park surrounding it is full of cherry trees and ferns. Glad to see this isn’t changing!

Before

Elevator entrance construction - February 27, 2012

Elevator entrance construction - February 27, 2012

After

Burrard Station

Entrance from park

Cross-section of Burrard Station (Source: Transit in British Columbia: The First Hundred Years, 1990)

Couldn’t resist putting this one in. Do you see any differences between this drawing and the station today?

A gondola for Seattle?

27 Feb

With so much talk of a gondola to connect SFU Burnaby with the SkyTrain system, Seattle is now considering one as well. The promise of an aerial gondola would connect the waterfront, Seattle Center, South Lake Union and Capitol Hill. Below are images from a post from City Talk.

Now, you may be thinking, “don’t they have that monorail already that was used for some exposition and now just sits as an awkward tourist attraction?” Yes. Yes, they do. I can’t help but think this would inevitably turn into Monorail 2.0, but there is something kind of neat about this proposal. The “cherry on top” they are calling it, are two towers that the gondola cars would pass through.

Here’s the write up:

One last exciting element here is the cherry on top of the hill. Imagine an iconic tower in the Capitol Hill light rail station area redevelopment.  I’m showing a gondola terminal located about 160 feet up a 400-foot-tall tower that would include a public viewing terrace, restaurant and bar with views in every direction.

The lower portion of the tower could be used as a destination hotel with conference and meeting facilities in the base, possibly combined with a joint-use community center for the local community. Businesses, services and organizations could symbiotically collaborate to occupy the second and/or third floors while the ground floor would be dedicated to street activation in the form of retail and restaurants.

Yes, this is controversial and certainly not allowed by current zoning. However, a tower at this location could be rationalized by the gondola, which is an exceptional public asset (and vice versa). The tower is essential to allow the gondola system to be strung well over the existing buildings on the west slope of Capitol Hill. The tower would also contain the receiving terminal, which needs to be mounted approximately 160 feet or higher above the street. It’s also a means to an end as the added development could better provide the desired neighborhood amenities and public benefits package as identified in the neighborhood’s urban design framework plan (UDF).

The current UDF plan suggests up-zoning this site by one or two stories, which may add 20-25% more capacity to the site. That will bring some value to the project, but it won’t buy much in terms of the long list of public amenities desired by the community. I’m suggesting a doubling or tripling of development capacity that is concentrated in the tower where it can take advantage of the great views.

Assuming a tower is possible, I’d propose it be a stand-alone beacon celebrating the station and the unique attributes of the neighborhood. It could be the next generation’s Space Needle, designed by a rigorous international competition and with no other towers allowed in the district. As the only tower, more sun, light, air and views would be maintained on the station area site. It could be slender and graceful, and set back slightly from the street. I’m showing a form in these illustrations for scale and to show how a gondola would be incorporated. Clearly more design work is needed, and that could be an opportunity for community engagement.

As many have observed, more people living and working in the station area is a public benefit, even if some of them occupy high-end condominiums at the top of the tower. Their carbon footprint will be significantly less living here than if they lived on 10 acres in Woodinville and commuted into town each day. They would potentially help pay for some 250 units of affordable housing, a district energy system, the Nagle Place Market and a community center.

Thoughts? This seems like something worth following, especially with Seattle’s recent plan to demolish and tunnel the Alaskan Way viaducts and their rather progressive push for change in and around the downtown core lately.

Cities From Space

25 Feb

All sizes | Eastern Coast of United States | Flickr – Photo Sharing!.

4837-4861 Cambie Street: rezoning in the Cambie Corridor

24 Feb

An application is pending with the City of Vancouver to rezone several RS-1 sites along Cambie Street to CD-1 (comprehensive development). This application will be one of many (to come) considered under the Cambie Corridor Plan approved by Council back in May 2011.

Site Context for 4837-4861 Cambie Street

The proposal is for a 5-story building with 41 residential units, 49 underground parking stalls, and 86 bicycle storage spaces. The photo composites below show how the building will fit into the existing character of the neighbourhood, which right now is primarily low-density, single family homes (click for larger image). This building certainly reflects the vision of mid-rise residential buildings that the Corridor plan calls for along Cambie Street.

Mid-rise building along Cambie Street

Cambie Corridor vision, Queen Elizabeth Precinct (Source: City of Vancouver)

An open house is scheduled for Monday, February 27, 2012 | 5:00 – 7:30PM, Holy Name of Jesus Parish.

This site will also eventually be located next to a Canada Line station, at 33rd Avenue. No word on when/if that station will be added, and don’t hold your breath.

Cambie Corridor study area with Canada Line stations (Source: City of Vancouver)

Urban Links

21 Feb
  • Check out the 100 Mile House Ideas CompetitionParticipants are challenged to design a house to accommodate 4 people with a maximum area of 1200 square feet (111M2) using only materials and systems made/ manufactured / recycled within 100 miles of the City of Vancouver (emphasis is NOT on affordable housing).
  • Another from the Atlantic: a feature on British Columbia’s 2nd city, Surrey, BC.


Cool timelapse in Rotterdam (though, it’s a promo vid for a Rem Koolhaas designed building)

The Beasley

18 Feb

Burnham Square Condominiums, The Balton, Robert Moses Middle School. Do you know what these three structures have in common? They were named after urban planners. Larry Beasley can now count himself among that group thanks to The Beasley a 33 storey, 218 unit condominium named after the City of Vancouver’s former planner.  Located on the edge of Yaletown at 888 Homer Street (Homer and Smithe), the condo replicates the podium style (retail on the bottom, residential up top) but with one big difference, a plaque the size of my torso is fixed to the front of the building. It reads:

The Beasley

A tribute to urban excellence

The Beasley is developed and built by Amacon, as a tribute to the City of Vancouver and its former Co-Director of planning, Larry Beasley. Both are recognized as leaders in urban sustainability, heritage restoration, affordable housing and mixed use development. These four pillars of urban planning helped to form the vision and design of The Beasley.

 I even took a picture.

The cursive font makes it looks like Larry personally signed off on it, giving the impression he was personally involved (I canonot confirm this). Not sure how I feel about the “affordable housing” in the plaque. I took a look at some recent listings for units in the building and they ranged from $499,000 (1-BR) and $699,000 (2-BR). Perhaps they are referring to other affordable housing projects they were involved with?

Census Canada 2011: City hall take note, you can’t fight suburbia | News | National Post

17 Feb

…Meanwhile, the National Post has gleaned a very different story from the census:

This continued growth comes despite what Mr. Cox calls “anti-suburban policies” that outlaw development on large swaths of land, creating scarcity and increasing housing prices. He believes governments should build more highways instead of trying to get the public riding mass transit. More highways, he argues, will cut down on traffic congestion, which leads to air pollution and less productive cities as workers spend more time on the road.

“You start drawing down a line around cities like they’re doing in Toronto and like they’ve done in Vancouver, you drive housing prices through the roof, young people won’t be able to afford houses…[As well, all the] data indicate the more dense you make a city, the higher you make the traffic congestion.

via Census Canada 2011: City hall take note, you can’t fight suburbia | News | National Post.

The emphasis is mine. Thoughts?

Gateway Program highway expansion: looking westbound on Highway 1, just before the Port Mann Bridge

Canada: Urbanized

15 Feb

The 2011 Census data is out and there’s a lot to sift through. The Globe and Mail has already put together some great interactive features: Rise of the West and Compare your Community. Their Census at a Glance has some basic infographics, including this one: 

This continues to confirm what we already know: Canada is highly urbanized nation and it’s becoming even more-so with less than 1 in 5 Canadians living in rural areas now. The Canadian experience is (and has been for a while now) an urban one – contrary to what many politicians try to say.

So what does this mean? Well, cities will continue to face huge challenges as they add more people (growing inequality and infrastructure costs to name a few). They will face discussions on how to organize/govern themselves (Toronto is still trying…) and they will be our hope for a sustainable future.

After all this, there seems to be very little discussion at a national level about our cities. Granted, there’s the whole ‘constitution’ thing, little interest from the Federal Government, and there  also seems to be some vestiges of a passé form of Canadian nationalism that idealizes or glorifies the rural. Still, now would seem an opportune time as any to begin talking about our cities: ways they can share ideas, talent, and other resources. Something like a cities exchange. Maybe.

What do you think? Do you think this type of national discussion about the future of our cities would be possible or even useful?

Upcoming Public Talks: Scott Bernstein

14 Feb

The Urban Studies Program is presenting two public talks by Scott Bernstein, President and Co-founder of the Center for Neighborhood Technology. CNT developed a Housing and Transportation (H&T) index to determine true housing affordability. “Only two in five American communities—or 39 percent—are affordable for typical households when their transportation costs are considered along with housing costs” (CNT Press Release).

Center for Neighborhood Technology

How will Vancouver determine housing affordability? And what role will location efficiency have in achieving economic sustainability?

Monday, March 19 at SFU Surrey | 7:00PM | Reserve

If Not Now, When? How Making Economic Progress Count Accelerates Public and Private Infrastructure Investment in Cities and Regions

Thursday, March 22 at SFU Vancouver | 7:00PM | Reserve

Progress Lost, Progress Redefined, Progress Regained – How Location Efficiency Performance Measures Are Being Used to Achieve Economic Security

From the CNT website:

Scott leads CNT’s work to understand and better disclose the economic value of resource use in urban communities, and helps craft strategies to capture the value of this efficiency productively and locally.

About the work of CNT:

The aim of CNT’s 2011 policy agenda is to develop and advocate for legislation and regulations that make use of a city’s intrinsic assets to build sustainable communities—sustainable economically, socially and environmentally. We can get there by pursuing four broad goals:  giving people more transportation options to lower the cost of living, making buildings more energy efficient, protecting our water by treating it as an asset rather than a waste product, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Poster for the March 22, 2012 talk at Harbour Centre, SFU Vancouver:

BernsteinVancouverMarch222012

Canada’s most romantic cities

8 Feb

Here is something to get you in the mood for Valentine’s Day. The most romantic city in Canada is Kingston, Ontario. According to an article in the Globe and Mail, a list by Amazon.ca ranked Kingston in top spot with Guelph and Kelowna in second and third spots respectively.

Source: City of Kingston

Now for the most important question but with the most disappointing answer. What criteria is Amazon using to rank the most romantic cities in Canada?

Sales data. Specifically, the sales volume of romance novels, sex and relationship books, and…the per capita sales of Michael Buble CDs. Excuse me? I was expecting a fascinating discussion on how romantic cities can be evaluated on their urban and natural qualities – like the number of cafes and public squares, views of the mountains and ocean, heritage buildings and architecture. Kingston definitely has some of these qualities, but do other contenders Guelph, Kelowna, Langley and Red Deer?

As a lover of cities, I think we can come up with a better list with better criteria. People are likely to use experiential criteria to rank romantic cities. Places that are rich in meaning and history, vibrant, and that reflect an authentic identity will probably create a lasting experience for someone. What are your most romantic cities? Why? Here are a few photos of mine.

Victoria. Source: tourismvictoria.com

 

Montreal. Source: Wikimedia Commons

 

Whistler. Source: Tourism Whistler

 

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 455 other followers